Journal
FOOD SCIENCE & NUTRITION
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages 3993-4002Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.2995
Keywords
aflatoxigenic; aflatoxin B-1; Aspergillus flavus; biocontrol; colony growth rate; non-aflatoxigenic
Categories
Funding
- Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) through GBP Grant Scheme [UPM/800-3/3/1/GPB/2018/9658100]
- Universiti Putra Malaysia
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study aimed to investigate the antagonism of several non-aflatoxigenic A. flavi strains against the aflatoxigenic ones, evaluating their colony growth rate and AFB(1) inhibition. The results showed that different non-aflatoxigenic strains exhibited varying degrees of antagonism against the aflatoxigenic ones, with 9% peanut concentration in the growth medium exhibiting the highest growth and AFB(1) inhibition.
Aspergillus section Ravi constitutes several species of opportunistic fungi, notable among them are A. flavus and A. parasiticus, capable of surviving harsh conditions and colonizing a wide range of agricultural products pre- and postharvest. Physical and chemical control methods are widely applied in order to mitigate the invasion of A. flavus in crops. However, physical control is not suitable for large scale and chemical control often leads to environmental pollution, whereas biological control offers a safer, environmentally friendly, and economical alternative. The present study aimed to investigate the antagonism of several non-aflatoxigenic A. fiavus strains against the aflatoxigenic ones in vitro (semisynthetic peanut growth medium; MPA) in terms of colony growth rate and AFB(1) inhibition. Different peanut concentrations were used to obtain the optimum peanut concentration in the formulated growth medium. A dual culture assay was performed to assess the antagonism of nonaflatoxigenic strains against the aflatoxigenic ones. Results revealed that 9% MPA exhibited the highest growth and AFB(1) inhibition by nonaflatoxigenic strains. It was also found that different nonaflatoxigenic strains exhibited different antagonism against the aflatoxigenic ones which ranged from 11.09 +/- 0.65% to 14.06 +/- 0.14% for growth inhibition, and 53.97 +/- 2.46% to 72.64 +/- 4.54% for AFB(1) inhibition. This variability could be due to the difference in antagonistic metabolites produced by different nonaflatoxigenic strains assessed in the present study. Metabolomics study to ascertain the specific metabolites that conferred the growth and aflatoxin inhibition is ongoing.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available