4.6 Article

Numerical Simulation Study on the Effect of Port Water Injector Position on the Gasoline Direct Injection Engine

Journal

PROCESSES
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr10101909

Keywords

gasoline direct injection engine; port water injection; knock; combustion

Funding

  1. Special Key Project of Chongqing Technology Innovation and Application Development, China [cstc2020jscx-dxwtBX0024]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the effects of six different cases of port water injection on the performance of a supercharged gasoline direct injection engine. The results show that case 2 and case 4 can effectively suppress knock and reduce emissions.
This paper explores the effects of six different cases of port water injection on the combustion, knock suppression and emissions of a supercharged gasoline direct injection (GDI) engine through numerical simulation. The six different intake port water injection cases included three vertical distances from cylinder center to water injector and two different injection directions. The results showed that cases 2 and 4 allowed more water and air to enter the cylinder and thus suppressed the knock, so the pressure oscillation was small. Case 2 had the largest turbulent kinetic energy in the center of the cylinder, which in turn facilitated the propagation of flame to the cylinder wall and suppressed the knock. The water injection cases shortened the combustion delay period compared to the no water cases. At the same time, the strong low temperature reaction of the end mixture produced a large amount of CH2O that decomposed into HCO. A high concentration and a large area of HCO distribution can predict the occurrence of a knock. In addition, the water injection cases (except for case 6) reduced the in-cylinder soot, unburned hydrocarbon (UHC) and CO emissions compared to the no water cases, but it increased NOX emissions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available