Dosimetric analysis and biological evaluation between proton radiotherapy and photon radiotherapy for the long target of total esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study is to compare the dosimetric and biological evaluation differences between photon and proton radiation therapy. MethodsThirty esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients were generated for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) planning to compare with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning. According to dose-volume histogram (DVH), dose-volume parameters of the plan target volume (PTV) and homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), and gradient index (GI) were used to analyze the differences between the various plans. For the organs at risk (OARS), dosimetric parameters were compared. Tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) was also used to evaluate the biological effectiveness of different plannings. ResultsCI, HI, and GI of IMPT planning were significantly superior in the three types of planning (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). Compared to IMRT and VMAT planning, IMPT planning improved the TCP (p<0.001, p<0.001, respectively). As for OARs, IMPT reduced the bilateral lung and heart accepted irradiation dose and volume. The dosimetric parameters, such as mean lung dose (MLD), mean heart dose (MHD), V-5, V-10, and V-20, were significantly lower than IMRT or VMAT. IMPT afforded a lower maximum dose (D-max) of the spinal cord than the other two-photon plans. What's more, the radiation pneumonia of the left lung, which was caused by IMPT, was lower than IMRT and VMAT. IMPT achieved the pericarditis probability of heart is only 1.73% +/- 0.24%. For spinal cord myelitis necrosis, there was no significant difference between the three different technologies. ConclusionProton radiotherapy is an effective technology to relieve esophageal cancer, which could improve the TCP and spare the heart, lungs, and spinal cord. Our study provides a prediction of radiotherapy outcomes and further guides the individual treatment.

Automated summary

This study compares the differences in dosimetric and biological evaluations between photon and proton radiation therapy. The results show that proton radiation therapy is superior to photon radiation therapy in terms of the plan conformity index, homogeneity index, and gradient index. Proton radiation therapy improves tumor control probability and reduces the dose and volume of radiation received by the lungs, heart, and spinal cord compared to photon therapy.