4.6 Article

Effect of circumferential resection margin status on survival and recurrence in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.965255

Keywords

neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy; circumferential resection margin; prognosis; recurrence; esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [82000514]
  2. Key Projects of Sichuan Provincial Department of Science and Technology [2021YFS0222]
  3. 1_3_5 project for disciplines of excellenceClinical Research Incubation Project, West China Hospital, Sichuan University [2018HXFH020]
  4. Regional Innovation and Collaboration projects of Sichuan Provincial Department of Science and Technology [2021YFQ0026]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation Regional Innovation and Development [U20A20394]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to investigate the impact of circumferential resection margin (CRM) status on survival and recurrence in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The results showed that a CRM greater than 1 mm had better overall survival, longer disease-free survival, and less recurrence compared to a CRM of 1 mm or less.
BackgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate whether circumferential resection margin (CRM) status has an impact on survival and recurrence in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. MethodsWe screened patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent esophagectomy from January 2017 to December 2019. The CRM was reassessed. Patients were grouped into a CRM of 1 mm or less (0 < CRM <= 1 mm) and a CRM greater than 1 mm (CRM>1 mm). The impact of CRM on survival was investigated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression modeling. The optimal CRM cut point was evaluated using restricted cubic spline curve. ResultsA total of 89 patients were enrolled in this study. The CRM status was an independent risk factor for the prognosis (HR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.16-0.73). Compared with a CRM of 1 mm or less, a CRM greater than 1 mm had better overall survival (HR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.16-0.73, log-rank P = 0.011), longer disease-free survival (HR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.27-0.95, log-rank P = 0.040), and less recurrence (HR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.23-0.85, log-rank P = 0.015). We visualized the association between CRM and the hazard ratio of survival and identified the optimal cut point at 1 mm. ConclusionsA CRM greater than 1 mm had better survival and less recurrence compared to a CRM of 1 mm or less. A more radical resection with adequate CRM could benefit survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available