4.6 Article

Case report: Intravitreal methotrexate in intraocular acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.951362

Keywords

intraocular leukemia; methotrexate; acute lymphoblastic leukemia; intravitreal injections; case report; intravitreal methotrexate

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Direct leukemic infiltration of the eye, often associated with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, may not be effectively treated with systemic therapy alone. Intravitreal methotrexate injections show promise as a therapeutic option for intraocular leukemia, though further evidence is needed to solidify its use in this debilitating localization.
Direct leukemic infiltration of the eye is most frequently associated with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), probably due to its well-known central nervous system (CNS) tropism. Systemic treatment alone may not be sufficient for intraocular leukemia. Data on local treatment are scarce. Here, we present two cases of intraocular ALL treated with intravitreal methotrexate (MTX). Initially, anatomical improvement and visual stability were observed. The first patient experienced anatomical and visual worsening after a year of treatment. Treatment was withheld after 2 months for the second patient due to poor systemic conditions. Corneal toxicity and intraocular pressure elevation were observed in the first case. In both cases, eye involvement was associated with CNS or systemic relapse. This highlights the importance of incorporating ocular disease management in a comprehensive approach to therapy. Our experience corroborates previous findings on MTX injections as an effective and safe therapeutic option for intraocular leukemia. Further evidence is needed to consolidate the use of intravitreal MTX to treat such a debilitating localization of leukemia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available