Journal
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY
Volume 61, Issue 1, Pages 24-28Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.12502
Keywords
breast MRI; FAST scan; screening
Funding
- MIA Radiology
Ask authors/readers for more resources
IntroductionScreening for breast cancer in high-risk women takes about 40minutes to acquire an MRI scan and is time-intensive to report. There is recent interest in the performance of an abbreviated MRI protocol (FAST) in the screening setting. FAST scans have a reported negative predictive value of 99.8%. This study evaluates the false positive rates (FPR) and recall rates for FAST scans as compared to full diagnostic studies (FD). MethodsA database of all screening breast MRI scans performed at our institution between 30 June 2013 and 1 July 2014 (n=591) was created by one of the researchers, who did not subsequently analyse the MRI scans. The T1W and first post-contrast and subtracted images from each of these scans (FAST protocol) were assessed by experienced breast MRI radiologists, blinded to the final diagnosis. The findings were then compared with the FD result. ResultsThe recall rates were 6.6% for FAST scans and 5.8% for FD scans. FPR rates were 4.7% and 3.9% respectively. There is no statistically significant difference in the recall rates or FPR of FAST scans in comparison with full diagnostic studies. ConclusionsGiven the absence of statistically significant difference in the FPR and recall rates in comparison with FD, FAST scans can replace FD for screening of breast cancer.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available