4.6 Review

Pro-tumorigenic role of type 2 diabetes-induced cellular senescence in colorectal cancer

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.975644

Keywords

senescence; diabetes; colon cancer; fibroblast; endothelial cells; tumour microenvironment

Categories

Funding

  1. Vetenskaps-radet (The Swedish Research Council) [2017-04663]
  2. Carl Tryggers Stiftelse [CTS:18:279]
  3. Vinnova [2017-04663] Funding Source: Vinnova
  4. Swedish Research Council [2017-04663] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide and is still considered incurable in advanced stages. Age-related cellular senescence and type 2 diabetes are known risk factors for CRC development, with recent findings suggesting a potential link between type 2 diabetes-induced premature cell senescence and CRC tumorigenesis.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. The disease still remains incurable and highly lethal in the advanced stage, representing a global health concern. Therefore, it is essential to understand the causes and risk factors leading to its development. Because age-related cellular senescence and type 2 diabetes (T2D) have been recognised as risk factors for CRC development, the recent finding that type 2 diabetic patients present an elevated circulating volume of senescent cells raises the question whether type 2 diabetes facilitates the process of CRC tumorigenesis by inducing premature cell senescence. In this review, we will discuss the mechanisms according to which T2D induces cellular senescence and the role of type 2 diabetes-induced cellular senescence in the pathogenesis and progression of colorectal cancer. Lastly, we will explore the current therapeutic approaches and challenges in targeting senescence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available