4.6 Review

Endothelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition in Atherosclerosis: Friend or Foe?

Journal

CELLS
Volume 11, Issue 19, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells11192946

Keywords

endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition; atherosclerosis; plaque stability

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [R56HL148025, R01HL150193]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Complications of atherosclerosis resulting from the rupture or erosion of unstable plaques remain the leading cause of death worldwide. Recent advances in cellular lineage tracing techniques have highlighted the role of individual cell types, including endothelial cells, in regulating plaque stability.
Despite many decades of research, complications of atherosclerosis resulting from the rupture or erosion of unstable plaques remain the leading cause of death worldwide. Advances in cellular lineage tracing techniques have allowed researchers to begin investigating the role of individual cell types in the key processes regulating plaque stability, including maintenance of the fibrous cap, a protective collagen-rich structure that underlies the endothelium. This structure was previously thought to be entirely derived from smooth muscle cells (SMC), which migrated from the vessel wall. However, recent lineage tracing studies have identified endothelial cells (EC) as an essential component of this protective barrier through an endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EndoMT), a process that has previously been implicated in pulmonary, cardiac, and kidney fibrosis. Although the presence of EndoMT in atherosclerotic plaques has been shown by several laboratories using EC-lineage tracing mouse models, whether EndoMT is detrimental (i.e., worsening disease progression) or beneficial (i.e., an athero-protective response that prevents plaque instability) remains uncertain as there are data to support both possibilities, which will be further discussed in this review.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available