4.6 Article

Is Lymphocyte C-Reactive Protein Ratio Useful for Predicting Survival in Patients with Non-Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma?

Journal

CANCERS
Volume 14, Issue 21, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers14215214

Keywords

lymphocyte- to- C-reactive protein ratio; soft tissue sarcoma; survival

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that lymphocyte to C-reactive protein ratio (LCR) can predict disease-specific survival (DSS) and event-free survival (EFS) in patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Patients with lower LCR had worse survival than those with higher LCR.
Simple Summary We hypothesized that lymphocyte to C-reactive protein ratio (LCR) could predict survival in 132 patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS). This study aimed to determine whether LCR before treatment can predict disease-specific survival (DSS) and event-free survival (EFS). The 5-year DSS in patients with higher and lower LCR was 86.5% and 52.8%, respectively (p < 0.001). Patients with lower LCR had worse survival than those with higher LCR. The 5-year EFS in patients with higher and lower LCR was 66.2% and 31.2%, respectively (p < 0.001). On Receiver operating characteristic analysis, however, there was no significant difference in the area under curve (AUC) between CRP level (AUC = 0.72) and LCR (AUC = 0.711). LCR was found to be a poor prognostic factor for oncological outcomes using multivariate analysis. although ROC analysis could not show the superiority of LCR to CRP for predicting oncological outcomes in patients with STS. Background: Recently, the lymphocyte-to-CRP ratio (LCR) was found to have a prognostic role in many cancers. However, the clinical significance of LCR in patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) has not yet been established. This study aimed to determine whether LCR can predict disease-specific survival (DSS) and event-free survival (EFS) in patients with STS. Methods: In this study, 132 patients were enrolled. The mean follow-up periods were 76.5 months. Blood examinations were performed prior to treatment for all patients. Results: The 5-year DSS in patients with higher and lower LCR was 86.5% and 52.8%, respectively (p < 0.001). Patients with lower LCR had worse survival than those with higher LCR. The 5-year EFS in patients with higher and lower LCR was 66.2% and 31.2%, respectively (p < 0.001). On Receiver operating characteristic analysis, however, there was no significant difference in the area under curve (AUC) between CRP level (AUC = 0.72) and LCR (AUC = 0.711). Conclusions: LCR may be a prognostic factor for predicting oncological events in multivariate analysis, although ROC analysis could not show the superiority of LCR to CRP for predicting oncological outcomes in patients with STS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available