4.7 Article

Degree of Pelvic Rotation in the Coronal Plane on Postoperative Radiographs Obtained after Total Hip Arthroplasty

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 11, Issue 21, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11216353

Keywords

pelvic rotation; total hip arthroplasty; Liaw's anteversion; hip osteoarthritis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study quantified the potential pelvic rotation in the coronal plane on postoperative plain radiographs and found that it cannot be neglected as it can affect the measurement of cup anteversion.
There are many published cup anteversion measurements for postoperative total hip arthroplasty (THA), including Liaw's, Lewinnek's, and Murray's methods. However, most measurements ignore the potential pelvic rotation on radiographs except in Liaw's method. Without considering pelvic rotation, clinicians can miscalculate cup anteversion. Therefore, we aimed to quantify the mean degree of pelvic rotation. Herein, we collected 388 radiographs of 98 postoperative THA hips of 77 patients and measured pelvic rotation by measuring h, the horizontal displacement of the sacrococcygeal junction associated with the upper pole of the symphysis pubis, and ssd, the distance between the sacrococcygeal junction and pubic symphysis. The angle theta of pelvic rotation was defined as theta = arc sin (h/ssd) x (180 degrees/pi). The mean degree of pelvic rotation was then calculated. The standard deviation of h was 7.84 mm, and the mean ssd was 158 mm. The potential pelvic rotation was 2.50 degrees. The p-values from the paired t-test were all >0.05 when interobserver and intraobserver errors were assessed. This is the first study to quantify the potential pelvic rotation in the coronal plane on postoperative plain radiographs. The potential pelvic rotation was too large to be neglected during the measurement of cup anteversion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available