4.7 Article

Association between Lower-to-Upper Ratio of Appendicular Skeletal Muscle and Metabolic Syndrome

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 11, Issue 21, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11216309

Keywords

metabolic syndrome; sarcopenia; muscle mass ratio

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In men, the association between appendicular skeletal muscle mass ratio and metabolic syndrome shows a reverse J-curve, while in women it follows a sine curve pattern. Maintaining an optimal ratio of muscle mass between upper and lower appendicular skeletal muscles is important in preventing MetS.
(1) Background: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a cluster-based disorder comprising several pre-disease or pre-clinical statuses for diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, cardiovascular risk, and mortality. Appendicular skeletal muscle (ASM), or lean mass, is considered the main site of insulin-mediated glucose utilization. Therefore, we aimed to reveal the association between lower appendicular skeletal muscle mass to upper appendicular skeletal muscle mass ratio (LUR) and risk for MetS. (2) Methods: We analyzed the 2008-2011 Korean National Health Examination and Nutrition Survey (KNHANES) data. Quintiles of lower ASM to upper ASM ratio (LUR) were categorized as follows: Q1: <= 2.65, Q2: 2.66-2.80, Q3: 2.81-2.94, Q4: 2.95-3.11, and Q5: >= 3.12 in men and Q1: <= 3.00, Q2: 3.01-3.18, Q3: 3.19-3.36, Q4: 3.37-3.60, and Q5: >= 3.61 in women. Multivariate logistic regression models were used after setting MetS and the LUR quintiles as the independent and dependent variables and adjusting for covariates. (3) Result: In men, MetS in accordance with the LUR quintiles exhibits a reverse J-curve. All groups from Q2 to Q5 had a lower odds ratio (OR) (95% CI) for MetS compared to the Q1 group. The lowest OR (95% CI) of 0.85 (0.80-0.91) was observed in Q4. However, in women, the figure shows a sine curve. Compared to the Q1 group, the Q2 and Q3 groups had a higher OR, while the Q4 and Q5 groups presented a lower OR. Among them, the OR (95% CI) in the Q4 group was lowest, at 0.83 (0.76-0.91). (4) Conclusions: While total appendicular skeletal muscle mass is important to prevent MetS, it is necessary to maintain an optimal ratio of muscle mass between the upper and lower appendicular skeletal muscle mass.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available