4.7 Article

Deep-learning-based hepatic fat assessment (DeHFt) on non-contrast chest CT and its association with disease severity in COVID-19 infections: A multi-site retrospective study

Journal

EBIOMEDICINE
Volume 85, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104315

Keywords

COVID-19; NAFLD; Hepatic steatosis

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [1U24CA199374-01, R01 CA202752-01A1, R01 CA208236-01A1, R01 CA216579-01A1, R01 CA220581-01A1, 1U01 CA239055-01, 1U01CA248226-01, 1U54CA254566-01]
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [1R01HL15127701A1]
  3. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering [1R43EB028736-01]
  4. National Center for Research Resources [C06 RR12463-01]
  5. VA Merit Review Award [IBX004121A]
  6. United States Department of Veterans Affairs Biomedical Laboratory Research and Development Service, The Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, through the Breast Cancer Research Program [W81XWH-19-10668]
  7. Prostate Cancer Research Program [W81XWH-15-1-0558, W81XWH-20-1-0851, W81XWH18-1-0440]
  8. Peer Reviewed Cancer Research Program [W81XWH-18-1-0404]
  9. Kidney Precision Medicine Project (KPMP) Glue Grant
  10. Ohio Third Frontier Technology Validation Fund [UL1TR0002548]
  11. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) component of the National Institutes of Health
  12. NIH Roadmap for Medical Research
  13. Wallace H. Coulter Foundation Program in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Case Western Reserve University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a deep-learning-based hepatic fat assessment (DeHFt) pipeline for segmenting and estimating liver attenuation on CT images, and investigates the association between hepatic steatosis and the severity of COVID-19 infections. The results show that DeHFt pipeline accurately assesses hepatic steatosis and reveals its association with the severity of COVID-19 infections.
Background Hepatic steatosis (HS) identified on CT may provide an integrated cardiometabolic and COVID-19 risk assessment. This study presents a deep-learning-based hepatic fat assessment (DeHFt) pipeline for (a) more standardised measurements and (b) investigating the association between HS (liver-to-spleen attenuation ratio <1 in CT) and COVID-19 infections severity, wherein severity is defined as requiring invasive mechanical ventilation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, death. Methods DeHFt comprises two steps. First, a deep-learning-based segmentation model (3D residual-UNet) is trained (N = 80) to segment the liver and spleen. Second, CT attenuation is estimated using slice-based and volumetric-based methods. DeHFt-based mean liver and liver-to-spleen attenuation are compared with an expert's ROI-based measurements. We further obtained the liver-to-spleen attenuation ratio in a large multi-site cohort of patients with COVID-19 infections (D1, N = 805; D2, N = 1917; D3, N = 169) using the DeHFt pipeline and investigated the association between HS and COVID-19 infections severity. Findings The DeHFt pipeline achieved a dice coefficient of 0.95, 95% CI [0.93-0.96] on the independent validation cohort (N = 49). The automated slice-based and volumetric-based liver and liver-to-spleen attenuation estimations strongly correlated with expert's measurement. In the COVID-19 cohorts, severe infections had a higher proportion of patients with HS than non-severe infections (pooled OR = 1.50, 95% CI [1.20-1.88], P < .001). Interpretation The DeHFt pipeline enabled accurate segmentation of liver and spleen on non-contrast CTs and automated estimation of liver and liver-to-spleen attenuation ratio. In three cohorts of patients with COVID-19 infections (N = 2891), HS was associated with disease severity. Pending validation, DeHFt provides an automated CT-based metabolic risk assessment. Copyright (C) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available