4.8 Article

An AMPK phosphoregulated RhoGEF feedback loop tunes cortical flow-driven amoeboid migration in vivo

Journal

SCIENCE ADVANCES
Volume 8, Issue 37, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abo0323

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [R37HD41900]
  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  3. New York Stem Cell Foundation Druckenmilller Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the authors developed cell type-specific imaging and perturbation techniques to investigate the migratory behavior of cells in the fruit fly Drosophila. They found that primordial germ cells (PGCs) use retrograde cortical actin flows for guidance during development. They also identified RhoGEF2 as an important regulator of cortical flow and demonstrated the mechanism by which it is regulated.
Development, morphogenesis, immune system function, and cancer metastasis rely on the ability of cells to move through diverse tissues. To dissect migratory cell behavior in vivo, we developed cell type-specific imaging and perturbation techniques for Drosophila primordial germ cells (PGCs). We find that PGCs use global, retrograde cortical actin flows for orientation and propulsion during guided developmental homing. PGCs use RhoGEF2, a RhoA-specific RGS-RhoGEF, as a dose-dependent regulator of cortical flow through a feedback loop requiring its conserved PDZ and PH domains for membrane anchoring and local RhoA activation. This feedback loop is regulated for directional migration by RhoGEF2 availability and requires AMPK rather than canonical G alpha(12/13) signaling. AMPK multisite phosphorylation of RhoGEF2 near a conserved EB1 microtubule-binding SxIP motif releases RhoGEF2 from microtubule-dependent inhibition. Thus, we establish the mechanism by which global cortical flow and polarized RhoA activation can be dynamically adapted during natural cell navigation in a changing environment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available