4.8 Article

Magnetic soft robotic bladder for assisted urination

Journal

SCIENCE ADVANCES
Volume 8, Issue 34, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abq1456

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFB1105100]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [82151313, 51820105008, 92048204]
  3. Innovation Foundation of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [2019kfyXKJC070]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we propose an implantable magnetic soft robotic bladder (MRB) that can assist urination in underactive bladders. The MRB is composed of a biocompatible elastomer composite with optimized magnetic domains, allowing it to contract the bladder when actuated by magnetic fields. Experimental results in a porcine model demonstrate successful urination with increased pressure and fast urine flow.
The poor contractility of the detrusor muscle in underactive bladders (UABs) fails to increase the pressure inside the UAB, leading to strenuous and incomplete urination. However, existing therapeutic strategies by modulating/repairing detrusor muscles, e.g., neurostimulation and regenerative medicine, still have low efficacy and/or adverse effects. Here, we present an implantable magnetic soft robotic bladder (MRB) that can directly apply mechanical compression to the UAB to assist urination. Composed of a biocompatible elastomer composite with optimized magnetic domains, the MRB enables on-demand contraction of the UAB when actuated by magnetic fields. A representative MRB for a UAB in a porcine model is demonstrated, and MRB-assisted urination is validated by in situ computed tomography imaging after 14-day implantation. The urodynamic tests show a series of successful urination with a high pressure increase and fast urine flow. Our work paves the way for developing MRB to assist urination for humans with UABs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available