4.8 Article

Bridging time scales of faulting: From coseismic to postseismic slip of the Mw 6.0 2014 South Napa, California earthquake

Journal

SCIENCE ADVANCES
Volume 8, Issue 38, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abq2536

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Charles University Grant SVV [115-009/260581]
  2. Grant Agency of the Charles University (GAUK) [570120]
  3. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic through the e-INFRA CZ [90140]
  4. French National Research Agency, UCAJEDI Investments in the Future project [ANR-15-IDEX-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study utilized a Bayesian dynamic source inversion method to jointly analyze coseismic and postseismic observations of the 2014 South Napa earthquake, providing insights into how fault stress and friction properties affect the spatial separation between afterslip and coseismic slip, driving deep off-fault aftershocks and influencing rupture shapes.
Transient fault slip spans time scales from tens of seconds of earthquake rupture to years of aseismic afterslip. So far, seismic and geodetic recordings of these two phenomena have primarily been studied separately and mostly with a focus on kinematic aspects, which limits our physical understanding of the interplay between seismic and aseismic slip. Here, we use a Bayesian dynamic source inversion method, based on laboratory-derived friction laws, to constrain fault stress and friction properties by joint quantitative modeling of coseismic and postseismic observations. Analysis of the well-recorded 2014 South Napa, California earthquake shows how the stressing and frictional conditions on the fault govern the spatial separation between shallow coseismic and postseismic slip, the progression of afterslip driving deep off-fault aftershocks, and the oblique ribbon-like rupture shape. Such inferences of stress and frictional rheology can advance our understanding of earthquake physics and pave the way for self-consistent cross-scale seismic hazard assessment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available