4.3 Article

A Span-based Target-aware Relation Model for Frame-semantic Parsing

Publisher

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/3569581

Keywords

FrameNet; frame-semantic parsing; frame identification; relation model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Frame-semantic Parsing (FSP) is a challenging and critical task in NLP. Existing studies suffer from error propagation and inefficient solutions. To address these problems, we propose a novel target-aware relation classification task and a lightweight jointly learning framework. Experimental results demonstrate significant improvement compared to state-of-the-art models.
Frame-semantic Parsing (FSP) is a challenging and critical task in Natural Language Processing (NLP). Most of the existing studies decompose the FSP task into frame identification (FI) and frame semantic role labeling (FSRL) subtasks, and adopt a pipeline model architecture that clearly causes error propagation problem. However, recent jointly learning models aim to address the above problem and generally treat FSP as a span-level structured prediction task, which, unfortunately, leads to cascading error propagation problem between roles and less-efficient solutions due to huge search space of roles. To address these problems, we reformulate the FSRL task into a target-aware relation classification task and propose a novel and lightweight jointly learning framework that simultaneously processes three subtasks of FSP, including frame identification, argument identification, and role classification. The novel task formulation and jointly learning with interaction mechanisms among subtasks can help improve the overall system performance and reduce the search space and time complexity, compared with existing methods. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that our proposed model significantly outperforms 10 state-of-the-art models in terms of F1 score across two benchmark datasets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available