4.6 Article

Liquid-liquid phase reaction between crystal violet and sodium hydroxide: kinetic study and precipitate analysis

Journal

ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE
Volume 9, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.220494

Keywords

crystal violet; kinetic parameter; UV-vis spectroscopy; Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy; solvent violet 9

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the reaction order and kinetic parameters of the reaction between crystal violet and sodium hydroxide. The overall reaction order is found to be approximately 2 based on both the pseudo rate method and the half-life method. Precipitation is observed at high concentrations of crystal violet and sodium hydroxide, with the precipitate having a molecular structure matching that of solvent violet 9.
To investigate reaction order and kinetic parameters of the reaction between crystal violet (CV) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH), various concentrations of the reactants were applied. The present work also verifies the unknown solid product produced under highly concentrated conditions. The reaction orders of CV and NaOH were determined to be 1 and 1.08 by pseudo rate method, respectively, with a rate constant, k, of 0.054 [(M-1.08) s(-1)]. In addition to pseudo rate method, the half-life approach was used to calculate the overall reaction order to verify the accuracy of pseudo rate method. The overall reaction order was determined to be 1.9 by the half-life method. The overall reaction order based on the two methods studied was approximately 2. The precipitate formation was observed when high concentrations of CV (0.01-0.1 M) and NaOH (1.0 M) were applied. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy was used to compare the spectra of the precipitate generated and a commercial solvent violet 9 (SV9). Based on the FTIR spectra, it was confirmed that the molecular structure of the precipitate matched that of solvent violet 9.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available