4.7 Article

Correlation between the microstructure and low thermal conductivity of plasma-sprayed Yb2O3-Y2O3 co-doped strontium zirconate coatings

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.07.048

Keywords

Thermal barrier coatings (TBCs); Strontium zirconate; Microstructure; Thermal conductivity

Funding

  1. National Key Technologies R&D Program of China [2018YFB0704400]
  2. Shanghai Technical Platform for Testing on Inorganic Materials [19DZ2290700]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Yb2O3-Y2O3 co-doped Sr(Zr0.9Yb0.05Y0.05)O-2.95 coatings exhibit low thermal conductivity due to their microstructural features, such as small grain size, solid solution, and special grain boundary structures.
Yb2O3-Y2O3 co-doped strontium zirconate coatings (Sr(Zr0.9Yb0.05Y0.05)O-2.95) were investigated as promising materials for thermal barrier coating (TBC) applications. Two types of Sr(Zr0.9Yb0.05Y0.05)O-2.95 coatings prepared under suitable atmospheric plasma spraying parameters have low thermal conductivity, approximately 0.60 W m(-1) K-1 at 1100 degrees C. The low thermal conductivities of these two coatings can be attributed to their microstructures, such as small grain size, solid solution, and special grain boundary structures. In both Sr(Zr0.9Yb0.05Y0.05)O-2.95 coatings, Yb3+ and Y3+ ions aggregated at the grain boundaries, hinder grain growth and reduce grain size. The rare-earth element distribution and transmission electron microscopy analysis of the coatings indicated that the dopant atoms replaced some of the Zr4+ ions at the grains and grain boundaries, successfully introducing oxygen vacancies and strain fields. These are two important reasons for the low thermal conductivity of Sr(Zr0.9Yb0.05Y0.05)O-2.95 coatings. In addition, the lower thermal conductivity of the Sr(Zr0.9Yb0.05Y0.05)O-2.95-B coating is attributed to the presence of wider grain boundary structures composed of tightly packed nanocrystals. (C) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available