4.7 Article

Parameters estimation and fatigue life prediction of sisal fibre reinforced foam concrete

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.07.096

Keywords

Foam concrete; Sisal fibre; Fatigue life; Weibull distribution

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51568009]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LY18E080028]
  3. Wenzhou Municipal Science and Technology Bureau [S20190001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Based on the Glivenko-Cantelli theorem and Weibull distribution functions, this study investigates the fatigue life of foam concrete with different sisal fibre volume fractions. The three-parameter Weibull analysis provides more accurate results, and the fatigue lives of foam concrete with different survival probabilities are analyzed and compared by comparing the distributions of probability density functions.
Based on the Glivenko-Cantelli theorem and Weibull distribution functions, the fatigue life of foam concrete with different sisal fibre volume fraction (0-0.3% vol.) was performed. When the two-parameter Weibull function was selected, a linear regression analysis showed that the fatigue life had high correlation between the independent and dependent variables (correlation coefficients above 0.75). But the three-parameter Weibull analysis gave more accurate results (correlation coefficients above 0.90). Then, the corresponding Weibull probability density function distributions of the fatigue lives were compared. Based on the parameters obtained, the fatigue lives of foam concrete with different survival probabilities were analyzed and compared with results taken from the literature. Finally, for specific survival probabilities, the fatigue limit and fatigue life of foam concrete under specified stress level were predicted. (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available