4.3 Article

A lightweight design approach for an EMU carbody using a material selection method and size optimization

Journal

JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages 673-681

Publisher

KOREAN SOC MECHANICAL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1007/s12206-016-0123-8

Keywords

Urban transit; Material selection method; Size optimization; CFRP sandwich composite; Composite hybrid carbody

Funding

  1. Research Program Developing accident reconstruction technology for damage scope analysis on derailment/collision of complex train accidents - Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport of the Korean government [15CTAP-C077444-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes a weight reduction design approach for urban transit carbody using a material selection method and size optimization. First, the material selection method, which uses specific stiffness and strength indices to predict the weight reduction rate, is set up when the materials of the under-frame and roof structure are substituted. The CFRP was chosen as the best weight reduction material in terms of the material selection method but was not appropriate for application to an urban transit carbody as a thin panel because of out-of-plane deformation. Therefore, we applied CFRP-AL honeycomb sandwich composites to the under-frame and roof structures, and the size optimization method was subsequently applied to derive a lightweight composite hybrid carbody design. Finally, the proposed approach was applied to an urban transit carbody, i.e., a Korean electrical multiple units carbody made of aluminum extrusion profiles. The weight of the optimized composite hybrid carbody design was 29.0% lighter than that of the original K-EMU. The resulting composite hybrid carbody design satisfied the design guidelines of the Performance test standard for K-EMU according to the corresponding FE simulations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available