4.7 Article

Analysis of the Hydrogeological Conditions Affecting Fault Response to Nearby Hydraulic Fracturing

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH
Volume 127, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2022JB024881

Keywords

Coulomb Failure Stress; induced seismicity; poroelasticity; hydraulic fracturing; pressure diffusion; fault

Funding

  1. University Research Board at the American University of Beirut [103780, 24698]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the response of nearby faults to hydraulic fracturing (HF) operations and identifies the hydrogeological factors that affect their stability and response. The study highlights the importance of pore pressure, fault location and architecture, and injection rate in inducing seismicity. The findings emphasize the need to carefully consider fault characteristics and reduce injection rates to mitigate induced seismicity from HF operations.
The response of critically stressed dormant faults to fluid perturbation, by oil and gas production, has been a major public concern because of its link to induced seismicity. In this paper, we study the hydrogeological factors that affect a nearby fault response, during and after hydraulic fracturing (HF) operations, evaluated by the change in Coulomb Failure Stress (CFS) and the rate of seismicity (R) through coupling solid deformation and fluid flow. Our results show that the pore pressure increases rapidly in a fault that is close (hydraulically connected) to HF operations, which might lead to its activation when the injection rate is high. When the fault is adjacent to HF but distant from it, its shallow region is subjected to a stabilizing deformation-induced normal compressive stress and its deeper region is destabilized under extension. In this case, the fault orientation and damage zone size have a significant effect on the fault's stability and response. On the other hand, decreasing the rate of injection can either increase or decrease the CFS values depending on the fault location and the dominant stresses. Therefore, serious attention should be given to the fault position, its architecture, and the injection rate to help reduce the potential for induced seismicity from HF. Our findings are verified and confirmed using the case of the Duvernay formation in Alberta, Canada, where the reported seismic data correlate with high CFS and R values.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available