4.6 Review

Pathogenic mitochondrial DNA 3243A>G mutation: From genetics to phenotype

Journal

FRONTIERS IN GENETICS
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.951185

Keywords

m.3243A > G; phenotype; genetics; heteroplasmy; fertility counseling

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [NSCF- NSCF-81971455, NSCF-U20A20350, 81871216]
  3. Key Project of Scientific Research Fund of Anhui Institute of Translational Medicine [2021YFC2700901]
  4. [2021zhyx-B12]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review elaborates on the characteristics of the m.3243A > G mutation, from genetics to phenotype and the relationship between them, as well as potential strategies for disease prevention, providing guidance for clinicians providing genetic counseling to m.3243A > G patients.
The mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) m.3243A > G mutation is one of the most common pathogenic mtDNA variants, showing complex genetics, pathogenic molecular mechanisms, and phenotypes. In recent years, the prevention of mtDNA-related diseases has trended toward precision medicine strategies, such as preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and mitochondrial replacement therapy (MRT). These techniques are set to allow the birth of healthy children, but clinical implementation relies on thorough insights into mtDNA genetics. The genotype and phenotype of m.3243A > G vary greatly from mother to offspring, which compromises genetic counseling for the disease. This review is the first to systematically elaborate on the characteristics of the m.3243A > G mutation, from genetics to phenotype and the relationship between them, as well as the related influencing factors and potential strategies for preventing disease. These perceptions will provide clarity for clinicians providing genetic counseling to m.3243A > G patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available