4.6 Article

Does long-term phenytoin have a place in Dravet syndrome?

Journal

ANNALS OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL NEUROLOGY
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages 2036-2040

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/acn3.51684

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Centre for Research Excellence Grant [GNT2006841]
  2. NHMRC Synergy Grant [GNT2010562]
  3. NHMRC Senior Investigator Fellowship [GNT1172897]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although anti-seizure medications that block sodium channels are generally not recommended for Dravet syndrome, there is ongoing debate about the use of the sodium-channel blocker phenytoin, which is commonly used to treat status epilepticus in Dravet syndrome patients. This study reports four cases of Dravet syndrome patients who experienced a reduction in seizure frequency and duration with long-term phenytoin therapy. In two patients, phenytoin resulted in prolonged periods without status epilepticus for the first time. Attempts to discontinue phenytoin in all patients after 1 to 20 years of use led to worsened seizure control. Reintroducing phenytoin improved seizure control, suggesting its potential benefits in certain Dravet syndrome patients.
Anti-seizure medications that block sodium channels are generally considered contraindicated in Dravet syndrome. There is, however, considerable debate about the sodium-channel blocker phenytoin, which is often used for status epilepticus, a frequent feature of Dravet syndrome. We describe four patients with Dravet syndrome in whom long-term phenytoin therapy reduced seizure frequency and duration. In two patients, phenytoin produced prolonged periods without status epilepticus for the first time. Attempting to wean phenytoin in all patients after 1 to 20 years of use resulted in seizure exacerbation. Reintroducing phenytoin improved seizure control, suggesting phenytoin is beneficial in some patients with Dravet syndrome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available