4.7 Article

Introducing the FAIR Principles for research software

Journal

SCIENTIFIC DATA
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41597-022-01710-x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation [G-2021-14116]
  2. Wellcome Trust [222436/Z/21/Z]
  3. UKRI research councils [EP/S021779/1]
  4. Wellcome Trust [222436/Z/21/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research software is a vital part of research, but faces challenges in discoverability, productivity, quality, reproducibility, and sustainability. Open science, open source, and FAIR communities aim to improve scholarship by applying FAIR principles to research software. The FAIR4RS Working Group has developed the FAIR4RS Principles, which outline the importance of research software in maximizing research value. Implementation examples are shared to enhance the impact of this work.
Research software is a fundamental and vital part of research, yet significant challenges to discoverability, productivity, quality, reproducibility, and sustainability exist. Improving the practice of scholarship is a common goal of the open science, open source, and FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable) communities and research software is now being understood as a type of digital object to which FAIR should be applied. This emergence reflects a maturation of the research community to better understand the crucial role of FAIR research software in maximising research value. The FAIR for Research Software (FAIR4RS) Working Group has adapted the FAIR Guiding Principles to create the FAIR Principles for Research Software (FAIR4RS Principles). The contents and context of the FAIR4RS Principles are summarised here to provide the basis for discussion of their adoption. Examples of implementation by organisations are provided to share information on how to maximise the value of research outputs, and to encourage others to amplify the importance and impact of this work.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available