4.7 Article Data Paper

Lake volume variation in the endorheic basin of the Tibetan Plateau from 1989 to 2019

Journal

SCIENTIFIC DATA
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41597-022-01711-w

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences Strategic Priority Research Program [XDA20020100]
  2. Young Scientists Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [42201282]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of the Higher Education Institutions of Jiangsu Province, China [21KJB170010]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [42271271]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study conducted a census of annual relative lake volume (RLV) for 976 lakes larger than 1 km(2) on the endorheic basin of the Tibetan Plateau (EBTP) from 1989 to 2019 using Landsat imagery and digital terrain models. The dataset complements existing lake datasets by providing comprehensive and long-term lake water volume change data for the region.
Lake storage change serves as a unique indicator of natural climate change on the Tibetan Plateau (TP). However, comprehensive lake storage data, especially for lakes smaller than 10 km(2), are still lacking in the region. In this dataset, we completed a census of annual relative lake volume (RLV) for 976 lakes, which are larger than 1 km(2), on the endorheic basin of the Tibetan Plateau (EBTP) during 1989-2019 using Landsat imagery and digital terrain models. Our method first identifies individual lakes, determines their analysis extents and calculates annual lake area from Landsat imagery. It then derives lake area-elevation relationship, estimates lake surface elevation, and calculates RLV. Validation and comparison with several existing datasets indicate our data are more reliable and comprehensive. Our study complements existing lake datasets by providing a complete and long-term lake water volume change data for the region.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available