4.7 Article Data Paper

Implementation of FAIR principles in the IPCC: the WGI AR6 Atlas repository

Journal

SCIENTIFIC DATA
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41597-022-01739-y

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. MCIN/AEI [PID2019-111481RB-I00, MDM-2017-0765]
  2. European Union [824084]
  3. CORDyS project - MCIN/AEI [PID2020-116595RB-I00]
  4. Universidad de Cantabria
  5. Consejeria de Universidades, Igualdad, Cultura y Deporte del Gobierno de Cantabria

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article introduces a case study of the application of the FAIR Guiding Principles in the Atlas chapter of the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. It discusses the challenges faced during the implementation, the improvements made based on recommendations from a pilot review, and the re-use of the repository resources to produce customized regional information.
The Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has adopted the FAIR Guiding Principles. We present the Atlas chapter of Working Group I (WGI) as a test case. We describe the application of the FAIR principles in the Atlas, the challenges faced during its implementation, and those that remain for the future. We introduce the open source repository resulting from this process, including coding (e.g., annotated Jupyter notebooks), data provenance, and some aggregated datasets used in some figures in the Atlas chapter and its interactive companion (the Interactive Atlas), open to scrutiny by the scientific community and the general public. We describe the informal pilot review conducted on this repository to gather recommendations that led to significant improvements. Finally, a working example illustrates the re-use of the repository resources to produce customized regional information, extending the Interactive Atlas products and running the code interactively in a web browser using Jupyter notebooks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available