4.1 Article

Rejection odds and rejection ratios: A proposal for statistical practice in testing hypotheses

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 72, Issue -, Pages 90-103

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2015.12.007

Keywords

Odds; Bayesian; Frequentist; Bayes factors

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DMS-1007773, DMS-1407775, BCS-1521855]
  2. National Institutes of Health National Institute on Aging [R01-AG042568]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Much of science is (rightly or wrongly) driven by hypothesis testing. Even in situations where the hypothesis testing paradigm is correct, the common practice of basing inferences solely on p-values has been under intense criticism for over 50 years. We propose, as an alternative, the use of the odds of a correct rejection of the null hypothesis to incorrect rejection. Both pre-experimental versions (involving the power and Type I error) and post-experimental versions (depending on the actual data) are considered. Implementations are provided that range from depending only on the p-value to consideration of full Bayesian analysis. A surprise is that all implementations - even the full Bayesian analysis - have complete frequentist justification. Versions of our proposal can be implemented that require only minor modifications to existing practices yet overcome some of their most severe shortcomings. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available