4.6 Article

Outcome Prediction in Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: The IN-REvASC Score

Journal

JOURNAL OF STROKE
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 404-+

Publisher

KOREAN STROKE SOC
DOI: 10.5853/jos.2022.01606

Keywords

Stroke; Sinus thrombosis; intracranial; Prognosis

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of Health Ricerca Corrente-IRCCS Multimedica

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Risk factors for poor neurological outcome in patients with cerebral venous thrombosis were identified, and a prognostic score was derived and validated. This score showed better accuracy in predicting poor outcomes compared to existing scoring systems and could be useful for clinical decision making and targeted therapy.
Background We identified risk factors, derived and validated a prognostic score for poor neurological outcome and death for use in cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). Methods We performed an international multicenter retrospective study including consecutive patients with CVT from January 2015 to December 2020. Demographic, clinical, and radiographic characteristics were collected. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions were conducted to determine risk factors for poor outcome, mRS 3-6. A prognostic score was derived and validated. Results A total of 1,025 patients were analyzed with median 375 days (interquartile range [IQR], 180 to 747) of follow-up. The median age was 44 (IQR, 32 to 58) and 62.7% were female. Multivariable analysis revealed the following factors were associated with poor outcome at 90-day follow-up: active cancer (odds ratio [OR], 11.20; 95% confidence interval [Cl], 4.62 to 27.14; P<0.001), age (OR, 1.02 per year; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.04; P=0.039), Black race (OR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.10 to 4.27; P=0.025), encephalopathy or coma on presentation (OR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.39 to 5.30; P=0.004), decreased hemoglobin (OR, 1.16 per g/dL; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.31; P=0.014), higher NIHSS on presentation (OR, 1.07 per point; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.11; P=0.002), and substance use (OR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.16 to 4.71; P=0.017). The derived IN-REvASC score outperformed ISCVT-RS for the prediction of poor outcome at 90-day follow-up (area under the curve [AUC], 0.64 [95% CI, 0.79 to 0.87] vs. AUC, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.66 to 0.76], chi(2) P<0.001) and mortality (AUC, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.78 to 0.90] vs. AUC, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.66 to 0.79], chi(2) P=0.03). Conclusions Seven factors were associated with poor neurological outcome following CVT. The IN-REvASC score increased prognostic accuracy compared to ISCVT-RS. Determining patients at highest risk of poor outcome in CVT could help in clinical decision making and identify patients for targeted therapy in future clinical trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available