4.2 Article

Suicide Attempt Aftercare in Geriatric Patients: A Pilot Project

Journal

ISSUES IN MENTAL HEALTH NURSING
Volume 43, Issue 12, Pages 1130-1135

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01612840.2022.2127039

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This follow-up study used phone contacts to conduct a one-year follow-up on hospitalized patients aged 65 and older who had attempted suicide, and found that phone contacts were feasible in this vulnerable population. While the affective state remained relatively stable, activities and social isolation could not be modified.
Hospitalized patients after suicide attempts gave informed consent to a postvention project after discharge. A continuous caregiver contacted the subjects monthly by phone for a period of 1 year. In case of significant worsening and reoccurrence of suicidal ideations, immediate re-admission was possible. Ten subjects 65 years and older and hospitalized because of suicide attempts were included. The sample was presumed to be at high risk for repeated suicides because of somatic comorbidities and social isolation. Affective state was monitored using the PHQ-9. At the end, the social situation was assessed using the MILVA inventory. Of 16 patients screened for participation only 10 gave informed consent. Six subjects completed the study per protocol. Three subjects died (one suicide, two deaths by natural causes) and one dropped out for other reasons. At the end of the study, all completers appreciated the continuous guidance. While the affective state remained relatively stable in most subjects during the observed period, activities and social isolation could not be modified. Only one patient was readmitted during the project. Phone contacts proved to be feasible in the follow-up after suicide attempts especially in old age, because of the limited mobility of this vulnerable population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available