4.5 Article

Exploring the effects of serial and parallel elasticity on a hopping robot

Journal

FRONTIERS IN NEUROROBOTICS
Volume 16, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnbot.2022.919830

Keywords

serial elasticity; parallel elasticity; hopping robot; pneumatic artificial muscle; hybrid actuation

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG)
  2. [AH307/2-1]
  3. [AH307/4-1]
  4. [SE1042/29-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The interaction between motor control and morphological design of the human leg is crucial for efficient and robust locomotion. Serial PAM has a more pronounced impact on efficiency, performance, stability, and robustness of hopping, with increasing stiffness decreasing leg stiffness during the unloading phase.
The interaction between the motor control and the morphological design of the human leg is critical for generating efficient and robust locomotion. In this paper, we focus on exploring the effects of the serial and parallel elasticity on hopping with a two-segmented robotic leg called electric-pneumatic actuation (EPA)-Hopper. EPA-Hopper uses a hybrid actuation system that combines electric motors and pneumatic artificial muscles (PAM). It provides direct access to adjust the physical compliance of the actuation system by tuning PAM pressures. We evaluate the role of the serial and parallel PAMs with different levels of compliance with respect to four criteria: efficiency, performance, stability, and robustness of hopping against perturbations. The results show that the serial PAM has a more pronounced impact than the parallel PAM on these criteria. Increasing the stiffness of the serial PAM decreases the leg stiffness of the unloading phase during hopping. The stiffer the leg, the more efficient and the less robust the movement. These findings can help us further understand the human hopping mechanism and support the design and control of legged robots and assistive devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available