4.8 Review

Alterations in circulating markers in HIV/AIDS patients with poor immune reconstitution: Novel insights from microbial translocation and innate immunity

Journal

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1026070

Keywords

human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); acquired immure deficiency syndrome (AIDS); poor immune reconstitution (PIR); plasma markers; fecal markers; innate immunity; microbial translocation

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2018ZX10302-102]
  2. Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals' Ascent Plan [DFL20191802]
  3. Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Clinical Medicine Development of Special Funding Support [ZYLX202126]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review summarizes the mechanisms of immune non-responders and explores associated biomarkers to predict immune recovery.
After long-term anti-retroviral therapy (ART) treatment, most human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/Acquired Immure Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) patients can achieve virological suppression and gradual recovery of CD4(+) T-lymphocyte (CD4(+) T cell) counts. However, some patients still fail to attain normal CD4(+) T cell counts; this group of patients are called immune non-responders (INRs), and these patients show severe immune dysfunction. The potential mechanism of poor immune reconstitution (PIR) remains unclear and the identification of uniform biomarkers to predict the occurrence of PIR is particularly vital. But limited information is available on the relationship between circulating markers of INRs and immune recovery. Hence, this review summarises alterations in the intestine microbiota and associated markers in the setting of PIR to better understand host-microbiota-metabolite interactions in HIV immune reconstitution and to identify biomarkers that can predict recovery of CD4(+) T cell counts in INRs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available