4.6 Article

Lateral Capacity of URM Walls: A Parametric Study Using Macro and Micro Limit Analysis Predictions

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 12, Issue 21, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app122110834

Keywords

bond patterns; limit analysis; parameter influence; in-plane masonry wall

Funding

  1. FCT/MCTES through national funds (PIDDAC) under the RD Unit ISISE [UIDB/04029/2020]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union [833123]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [833123] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research compares the influence of texture on the lateral capacity of masonry walls using macro and micro limit analysis. The results show that the aspect ratios of the panels and blocks have the most significant effect on the results, while the bond types have no significant effect.
This research investigates the texture influence of masonry walls' lateral capacity by comparing analytical predictions performed via macro and micro limit analysis. In particular, the effect of regular and quasi-periodic bond types, namely Running, Flemish, and English, is investigated. A full factorial dataset involving 81 combinations is generated by varying geometrical (panel and block aspect ratio, bond type) and mechanical (friction coefficient) parameters. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) approach is used to investigate one-way and two-way factor interactions for each parameter in order to assess how it affects the horizontal load multiplier. Macro and micro limit analysis predictions are compared, and the differences in terms of mass-proportional horizontal load multiplier and failure mechanism are critically discussed. Macro and micro limit analysis provide close results, demonstrating the reliability of such approaches. Furthermore, results underline how the panel and block aspect ratio had the most significant effect on both the mean values and scatter of results, while no significant effect could be attributed to the bond types.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available