4.6 Article

Personalized Chinese Tourism Recommendation Algorithm Based on Knowledge Graph

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 12, Issue 20, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app122010226

Keywords

Chinese tourism knowledge graph; knowledge representation; personalized recommendation; collaborative filtering

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61902301]
  2. Shaanxi Provincial Science and Technology Department [2022JZ-35]
  3. Shaanxi Natural Science Basic Research Project [2022JM-394, 2022JQ-711]
  4. Xi'an Science and Technology Bureau Science and Technology Innovation Leading Project [21XJZZ0020, 21XJZZ0022]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a personalized Chinese tourism recommendation algorithm based on the Knowledge Graph, and significant improvements are achieved in the experiments.
Facing the massive tourism data, the recommendation system mines the user's interest to provide a personalized information service. The Knowledge Graph is introduced into a recommendation system, as auxiliary information can effectively solve the problems about data sparse and cold-start. Therefore, this paper proposes a new algorithm of personalized Chinese tourism recommendation based on the Knowledge Graph. First of all, because lack of the public Chinese tourism Knowledge Graph, a complete Chinese tourism Knowledge Graph is built. Secondly, a new B-TransD (Bernoulli-TransD) knowledge representation model is proposed to reduce the probability of false negative triples. Finally, the method of user interest model based on the attribute information of users and tourist attractions is proposed to improve the performance of the recommendation system. Experiments are conducted on a data set containing 9100 tourist attractions. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm achieves significant improvement over the existing algorithms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available