4.2 Article

Phedimus daeamensis (Crassulaceae a new species from Mt. Daeam in Korea

Journal

PHYTOKEYS
Volume -, Issue 212, Pages 57-71

Publisher

PENSOFT PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.3897/phytokeys.212.82604

Keywords

Molecular diagnosis; new species; Phedimus; phylogeny

Categories

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIT)
  2. [NRF-2021R1A6A3A01086610]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The new species of Phedimus found on Mt. Daeam is closely related to P. middendorffianus and P. takesimensis. The taxonomic problems in Phedimus are primarily caused by morphological variation and hybridization. Through morphological and molecular phylogenetic analysis, we were able to confirm the identity of the new species and provide a comprehensive description and key for classification.
Phedimus individuals from Mt. Daeam, once referred to as Phedimus sikokianus, exhibit certain morphological characters that are unique within the genus. Phedimus is one of the most notorious groups for taxonomic problems due to the high morphological variation found in leaf shape, stem numbers, phyllotaxis and seed structure. Taxa in Phedimus also easily hybridize, further leading to taxonomic confusion. To carefully confirm the identity of the putative new species from Mt. Daeam, we examined morphological characters from similar to 100 herbarium sheets of six closely related Phedimus species. A molecular phylogenetic approach was also employed to delimit the species boundary and infer the phylogenetic relationships among the seven Phedimus species, including the species from Mt. Daeam. Both morphological and molecular phylogenetic results indicated that the species found on Mt. Daeam is a new species that is more closely related to P. middendorffianus and P. takesimensis than to the remaining four Phedimus species. Here, we provided a full description of the new species P. daeamensis as well as an updated key for the seven Phedimus species examined.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available