4.6 Article

Publication delays and associated factors in ophthalmology journals

Journal

PEERJ
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PEERJ INC
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14331

Keywords

Publication delays; Ophthalmology journals; Bibliometrics; Impact factor

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81873675]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluates the publication delays and associated factors of peer-reviewed ophthalmology journals. The results show that high-impact factor journals with low acceptance rates tend to have quicker publication processes. However, no significant associations were found between publication delays and advance online publication (AOP) or open access (OA) rates.
Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the publication delays and correlative factors of peer-reviewed ophthalmology journals. Methods: The ophthalmology journals listed in the Journal Citation Report 2020 were retrieved from the Web of Science database. The first original research article of each journal issue from January to December 2020 was extracted, and its submission, final revision, acceptance, and publication dates were obtained. Information on impact factors, advance online publication (AOP) status, open access (OA) rate and acceptance rate in 2020 was also collected. The correlations between publication delays and potential associated factors were analyzed. Results: A total of 58 ophthalmology journals were included and information on 685 articles was collected. The median times from submission to acceptance, from acceptance to publication, and from submission to publication were 118.0 (IQR, 74.0-185.0) days, 31.0 (IQR, 15.0-64.0) days, and 161.0 (IQR, 111.0-232.0) days, respectively. A higher impact factor was correlated with shorter delays of acceptance and publication (P < 0.05). There was a positive correlation between acceptance rates and publication delays (r = 0.726, P = 0.007). Forty-seven (81.03%) journals provided AOP. There was no statistically significant difference for impact factors and publication delays between journal with and without AOP (all P > 0.05). No correlation between OA rate and publication delays or impact factors was detected (all P > 0.05). Conclusions: Journals with higher impact factors and lower acceptance rates tend to have quicker publication processes. No significant associations were detected between publication delays and AOP or OA rate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available