4.7 Article

Effect of Magnetic Heating on Stability of Magnetic Colloids

Journal

NANOMATERIALS
Volume 12, Issue 17, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano12173064

Keywords

iron oxide nanoparticles; aqueous alkaline solutions; ultrasonic technique; magnetic heating

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education and Science [003/RID/2018/19]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stable aqueous suspension of magnetic nanoparticles is crucial for magnetic hyperthermia and other applications. Magnetic field-induced agglomeration can deteriorate the material's magnetic properties. Proper sonication treatment can enhance stability and heating efficiency.
Stable aqueous suspension of magnetic nanoparticles is essential for effective magnetic hyperthermia and other applications of magnetic heating in an alternating magnetic field. However, the alternating magnetic field causes strong agglomeration of magnetic nanoparticles, and this can lead to undesirable phenomena that deteriorate the bulk magnetic properties of the material. It has been shown how this magnetic field influences the distribution of magnetic agglomerates in the suspension. When investigating the influence of the sonication treatment on magnetic colloids, it turned out that the hydrodynamic diameter as a function of sonication time appeared to have a power-law character. The effect of magnetic colloid ageing on magnetic heating was discussed as well. It was shown how properly applied ultrasonic treatment could significantly improve the stability of the colloid of magnetic nanoparticles, ultimately leading to an increase in heating efficiency. The optimal sonication time for the preparation of the magnetic suspension turned out to be time-limited, and increasing it did not improve the stability of the colloid. The obtained results are important for the development of new materials where magnetic colloids are used and in biomedical applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available