4.5 Article

Anisotropy of Out-of-Phase Magnetic Susceptibility: A Non-Standard Approach for Magnetic Subfabrics Determination in Variscan Granites of Iberian Massif

Journal

MINERALS
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/min12111376

Keywords

anisotropy of out-of-phase magnetic susceptibility; anisotropy of in-phase magnetic susceptibility; rock and mineral magnetism

Funding

  1. Fundacao para Ciencia e a Tecnologia-Portugal [UIDP/04683/2020]
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [UIDB/04683/2020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The magnetic susceptibility measured in an alternating field consists of in-phase and out-of-phase components. This study utilizes opAMS to directly determine the magnetic subfabrics defined by ferromagnetic minerals, showing lower magnetic susceptibility but higher magnetic anisotropy in opAMS. The ipAMS and opAMS tensors are generally coaxial.
The magnetic susceptibility measured in an alternating field is made up of in-phase and out-of-phase components. The in-phase Anisotropy of Magnetic Susceptibility (ipAMS) measures the bulk response of all minerals in a sample; however, out-of-phase AMS (opAMS) is sensitive to only select ferromagnetic minerals such as hematite, titanomagnetite, and ultrafine magnetite. The opAMS can be harnessed as a tool for the direct determination of magnetic subfabrics defined by ferromagnetic minerals. This work focuses on the following three Portuguese plutons: Lamas de Olo, Lavadores-Madalena, and Santa Eulalia. The results show that the magnetic susceptibility is lower in opAMS, the degree of magnetic anisotropy is much higher in the opAMS, and the ellipsoid shape parameter has no significant differences. The ipAMS and opAMS tensors are, in general, coaxial, which indicates that the standard AMS fabric is parallel to the subfabric of minerals such as hematite, titanomagnetite, and ultrafine magnetite.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available