4.1 Article

The acute effects of action observation training on upper extremity functions, cognitive processes and reaction times: a randomized controlled trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH
Volume 11, Issue 13, Pages 987-997

Publisher

Becaris Publishing
DOI: 10.2217/cer-2022-0079

Keywords

action observation; neuroscience; reaction time; selective attention; upper extremity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to investigate the acute effects of action observation training on upper extremity functions, cognitive functions, and response time in healthy young adults. The results showed that action observation training can enhance the performance of upper extremity-related functions. Observing self-actions resulted in statistically significant positive changes in multiple variables compared with other methods.
Aim: To investigate the acute effects of action observation training on upper extremity functions, cognitive functions and response time in healthy, young adults. Materials & methods: A total of 60 participants were randomly divided into five groups: the self-action observation group, action observation group, action practice group, non-action observation group and control group. The Jebsen-Taylor hand function test (JTHFT), nine-hole peg test, serial reaction time task and d2 test of attention were applied to the participants before and after the interventions. Results: JTHFT performance with both non-dominant and dominant hands improved significantly compared with baseline in all groups (p < 0.001). JTHFT performance with non-dominant and dominant hands differed between the groups (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Action observation training seems to enhance the performance of upper extremity-related functions. Observing self-actions resulted in statistically significant positive changes in more variables compared with other methods. However, its clinical effectiveness over the other methods should be investigated in future long-term studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available