4.6 Article

Isometric handgrip exercise impacts only on very short-term blood pressure variability, but not on short-term blood pressure variability in hypertensive individuals: A randomized controlled trial

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.962125

Keywords

hypertension; blood pressure; blood pressure variability; isometric exercise; handgrip; handgrip dynamometry; average real variability

Categories

Funding

  1. Research and Education Fund of the Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre (FIPE/HCPA)
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES) [2015-0279]
  3. CNPq [001]
  4. [309023/2015-7]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This randomized controlled trial investigated the effect of isometric handgrip exercise on blood pressure variability and blood pressure. The results showed that isometric handgrip exercise can reduce very short-term blood pressure variability, but has no effect on short-term variability. In a laboratory setting, isometric handgrip exercise promotes sustained blood pressure reduction, but this effect does not last beyond the recovery period.
Background: The effect of a single isometric handgrip exercise (IHG) on blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV) has not been addressed. This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effect of IHG vs. sham on BPV and BP. Methods: Hypertensive patients using up to two BP-lowering medications were randomly assigned to IHG (4 x 2 min; 30% of maximal voluntary contraction, MVC, with 1 min rest between sets, unilateral) or sham (protocol; 0.3% of MVC). Systolic and diastolic BP were assessed beat-to-beat in the laboratory before, during, and post-intervention and also using 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). BPV was expressed as average real variability (ARV) and standard deviation (SD). Results: Laboratory BPV, ARV and SD variability, had marked increase during the intervention, but not in the sham group, decreasing in the post-intervention recovery period. The overall change in ARV from pre- to 15 min post-intervention were 0.27 +/- 0.07 (IHG) vs. 0.05 +/- 0.15 (sham group), with a statistically significant p-value for interaction. Similarly, mean systolic BP increased during the intervention (IHG 165.4 +/- 4.5 vs. sham 152.4 +/- 3.5 mmHg; p = 0.02) as did diastolic BP (104.0 +/- 2.5 vs. 90.5 +/- 1.7 mmHg, respectively; p < 0.001) and decreased afterward. However, neither the short-term BPV nor BP assessed by ABPM reached statistically significant differences between groups. Conclusion: A single session of IHG reduces very short-term variability but does not affect short-term variability. IHG promotes PEH in the laboratory, but does not sustain 24-h systolic and diastolic PEH beyond the recovery period.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available