4.6 Review

Genetic insights into non-syndromic Tetralogy of Fallot

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.1012665

Keywords

Tetralogy of Fallot; non-syndromic; genetics; congenital heart disease; NOTCH1; FLT4; transcription factors

Categories

Funding

  1. Saudi Cultural Bureau in London
  2. King Khalid Univesity
  3. British Heart Foundation
  4. [PG/20/14/35030]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Congenital heart defects refer to structural abnormalities of the heart or blood vessels present at birth, affecting approximately 1% of newborns worldwide. Tetralogy of Fallot is the most common cyanotic congenital heart abnormality, accounting for 5-10% of all congenital cardiac defects. While some cases of TOF are associated with known diseases or chromosomal abnormalities, the majority are non-syndromic and have unknown causes.
Congenital heart defects (CHD) include structural abnormalities of the heart or/and great vessels that are present at birth. CHD affects around 1% of all newborns worldwide. Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) is the most prevalent cyanotic congenital cardiac abnormality, affecting three out of every 10,000 live infants with a prevalence rate of 5-10% of all congenital cardiac defects. The four hallmark characteristics of TOF are: right ventricular hypertrophy, pulmonary stenosis, ventricular septal defect, and overriding aorta. Approximately 20% of cases of TOF are associated with a known disease or chromosomal abnormality, with the remaining 80% of TOF cases being non-syndromic, with no known aetiology. Relatively few TOF patients have been studied, and little is known about critical causative genes for non-syndromic TOF. However, rare genetic variants have been identified as significant risk factors for CHD, and are likely to cause some cases of TOF. Therefore, this review aims to provide an update on well-characterized genes and the most recent variants identified for non-syndromic TOF.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available