4.7 Article

Application of physiologically-based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models to evaluate the interaction between nifedipine and apatinib

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.970539

Keywords

pharmacodynamics; drug-drug interaction (DDI); physiologically-based pharmacokinetics (PBPK); nifedipine; apatinib

Funding

  1. Minhang District Science and Technology Commission Foundation
  2. Shanghai Hospital Association Foundation [2020MHZ035]
  3. [YS2021028]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of pharmacokinetic changes on the antihypertensive effect of nifedipine caused by the co-administration with apatinib. The results showed that the exposure changes of nifedipine caused by combination with apatinib had little impact on the changes of systolic blood pressure. Therefore, nifedipine could be used in combination with apatinib without dose adjustment in clinic.
Aim: It has been found that the co-administration of nifedipine with apatinib could cause exposure changes of nifedipine in vivo. But, whether this pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction (DDI) between nifedipine and apatinib could enhance the antihypertensive effect of nifedipine, causing sever changes of blood pressure was unknown. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to conduct the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modelling to evaluate the effect of pharmacokinetic changes on the antihypertensive effect of nifedipine. Thus, the results could guide the co-administration of these two drugs in clinic. Methods: A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was first developed for nifedipine. The pharmacokinetic DDI between nifedipine and apatinib was evaluated. Then the verified PBPK models were linked to a PD model for investigating whether the exposure changes of nifedipine could cause severe changes in blood pressure. Furthermore, the changes in blood pressure caused by combination with apatinib were also assessed in patients with hepatic impairment via the PBPK/PD models. Results: The predicted area under plasma concentration-time profile (AUC), maximum concentration (C-max), area under effect-time profile (AUE), and maximum reduction in systolic blood pressure (R-max) are all within 0.5-2.0-fold of the observed data, indicating that the PBPK/PD models for nifedipine are successfully established. The increases of predicted AUC and C-max of nifedipine in the presence of apatinib are 1.73 and 1.41-fold, respectively. Co-administration of nifedipine with apatinib could cause exposure changes of nifedipine in vivo. However, the predicted AUE and R-max changes of nifedipine in the presence to the absence of apatinib in cancer patients as well as in patients with hepatic impairment are all within 1.25-fold. The results indicate that the exposure changes of nifedipine caused by combination of apatinib has little effect on the changes of systolic blood pressure both in cancer patients and patients with hepatic impairment. Conclusion: The pharmacokinetic changes of nifedipine caused by co-administration with apatinib has little impact on the antihypertensive effect of nifedipine. Apatinib is unlikely to cause severe pharmacodynamic DDI via inhibition of CYP3A4. It is suggested that nifedipine could be used in combination with apatinib without dose adjustment in clinic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available