4.2 Article

Overcoming Vaccine Hesitancy for Future COVID-19 and HIV Vaccines: Lessons from Measles and HPV Vaccines

Journal

CURRENT HIV/AIDS REPORTS
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages 328-343

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11904-022-00622-0

Keywords

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Human papillomavirus (HPV); Measles; COVID-19; Interventions; Vaccine hesitancy

Funding

  1. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [INV001288]
  2. Yale Institute for Global Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article reviews interventions to address measles and human papillomavirus vaccine hesitancy and discusses how these lessons can be applied to COVID-19 and future human immunodeficiency virus vaccines. The study found that context-specific interventions targeted directly at the population for vaccination and the use of financial incentives may be effective strategies to improve vaccine acceptance.
Background The discovery of vaccines significantly reduced morbidity and mortality of infectious diseases and led to the elimination and eradication of some. Development of safe and effective vaccines is a critical step to the control of infectious diseases; however, there is the need to address vaccine hesitancy because of its potential impact on vaccine uptake. Methods We conducted a narrative review of studies on interventions to address measles and human papillomavirus vaccine hesitancy. We discussed how lessons learned from these studies could be applied towards COVID-19 and future human immunodeficiency virus vaccines. Results We found that there are several successful approaches to improving vaccine acceptance. Interventions should be context specific and build on the challenges highlighted in various settings. Conclusion Strategies could be used alone or in combination with others. The most successful interventions directly targeted the population for vaccination. Use of financial incentives could be a potential tool to improve vaccine uptake.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available