4.2 Article

Accuracy and Precision of Opportunistic Measures of Body Composition from the Tanita DC-430U

Journal

CHILDHOOD OBESITY
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages 470-478

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/chi.2022.0084

Keywords

assessment; bioelectrical impedance analysis; measurement; validity

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study quantified the accuracy and precision of bioelectrical impedance (BIA)-estimated percent body fat (%BF) using different devices and measurement times. The results showed that the new BIA device Tanita DC-430U underestimated %BF but correctly ranked children in terms of %BF. Measurements taken at different times within a day were less precise compared to measurements taken at different days.
Background: It is essential to quantify the accuracy and precision of bioelectrical impedance (BIA)-estimated percent body fat (%BF) to better interpret community-based research findings that utilize opportunistic measures.Methods: Study 1 measured the accuracy of a new dual-frequency foot-to-foot BIA device (Tanita DC-430U) compared with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) among healthy elementary school-aged children (N = 50). Study 2 examined the precision of BIA %BF estimates within and between days among children and adults (N = 38).Results: Regarding accuracy, Tanita DC-430U underestimated %BF by 8.0 percentage points compared with DXA (20.6% vs. 28.5%), but correctly ranked children in terms of %BF. Differences in %BF between BIA and DXA were driven by lower BIA-estimated fat mass (7.8 kg vs. 9.9 kg, p < 0.05) and higher BIA-estimated fat-free mass (25.3 kg vs. 24.1 kg, p < 0.05). The absolute agreement between BIA and DXA for estimated %BF was moderate (concordance correlation coefficients = 0.53). Regarding precision, measures taken at the same time, but on different days (root mean square standard deviation [RMSD] = 0.42-0.74) were more precise than the measures taken at different times within a single day (RMSD = 1.04-1.10).Conclusion: The Tanita DC-430U substantially underestimated %BF compared with DXA, highlighting the need to assess accuracy of new BIA devices when they are introduced to the market. Opportunistic measures of %BF estimates were most precise when taken at consistent times and in the morning, but may be utilized throughout the day with an understanding of within- and between-day variability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available