4.5 Review

Functional connectivity in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia

Journal

BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR
Volume 12, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2790

Keywords

functional connectivity; fMRI; bvFTD; frontotemporal dementia; brain

Funding

  1. Lund University
  2. Region Skane
  3. The Schorling Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Functional connectivity (FC) in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) has been summarized in this review. The most consistent finding is decreased FC within the salience network (SN), but FC changes extend beyond the SN and affect the interplay between networks. FC is associated with symptoms, functional impairment, and cognition, and the functional architecture resembles patterns of neuropathological spread.
Introduction Functional connectivity (FC)-which reflects relationships between neural activity in different brain regions-has been used to explore the functional architecture of the brain in neurodegenerative disorders. Although an increasing number of studies have explored FC changes in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), there is no focused, in-depth review about FC in bvFTD. Methods Comprehensive literature search and narrative review to summarize the current field of FC in bvFTD. Results (1) Decreased FC within the salience network (SN) is the most consistent finding in bvFTD; (2) FC changes extend beyond the SN and affect the interplay between networks; (3) results within the Default Mode Network are mixed; (4) the brain as a network is less interconnected and less efficient in bvFTD; (5) symptoms, functional impairment, and cognition are associated with FC; and (6) the functional architecture resembles patterns of neuropathological spread. Conclusions FC has potential as a biomarker, and future studies are expected to advance the field with multicentric initiatives, longitudinal designs, and methodological advances.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available