4.0 Article

The sensitivity of the IOP-29 and IOP-M to coached feigning of depression and mTBI: An online simulation study in a community sample from the United Kingdom

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Psychology, Clinical

Detection of Feigning of Different Symptom Presentations With the PAI and IOP-29

Claudia Pignolo et al.

Summary: This study examined the effectiveness of negative distortion measures from the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) and Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29) in different symptom presentations. The results suggest that the PAI Negative Impression Management scale and the IOP-29 are the most effective measures across all symptom presentations.

ASSESSMENT (2023)

Article Clinical Neurology

A clinical comparison simulation study using the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29) with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in Lithuania

Guste Ilgunaite et al.

Summary: This study contributes to the validity of the Inventory of Problems - 29 (IOP-29) in distinguishing feigned from genuine mental or cognitive disorders. The Lithuanian version of IOP-29 showed a high level of discrimination between genuine and experimentally feigned major depression. The findings also support the cross-cultural applicability of IOP-29 and its use in forensic evaluations.

APPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY-ADULT (2022)

Article Clinical Neurology

An Australian study on feigned mTBI using the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29), its Memory Module (IOP-M), and the Rey Fifteen Item Test (FIT)

Jennifer Gegner et al.

Summary: The study investigated the classification accuracy of IOP-29 and its memory module in an Australian community sample, showing that IOP-29 outperformed IOP-M and FIT in detecting feigned mTBI. Notably, both IOP-29 and IOP-M demonstrated excellent sensitivity and specificity, while FIT showed lower sensitivity but nearly perfect specificity in simulation conditions.

APPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY-ADULT (2022)

Article Clinical Neurology

The utility of the Wisconsin card sorting test, 64-card version to detect noncredible attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

Karen M. Kosky et al.

Summary: This study examines the sensitivity of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) in detecting noncredible performance in ADHD and emphasizes the importance of considering tests of various cognitive abilities in the evaluation of performance validity.

APPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY-ADULT (2022)

Review Psychology, Clinical

Assessing Negative Response Bias with the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29): a Quantitative Literature Review

Luciano Giromini et al.

Summary: This article reviews published studies on the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29) and provides information on its conditions of use, strengths, weaknesses, and optimal cut scores. The findings suggest that the IOP-29 has stronger correlations with symptom validity tests (SVTs) than with performance validity tests (PVTs), shows incremental validity when used with other validity checks, has comparable classification accuracy to other established tools, and performs well across various diagnoses and contexts. However, the excellent statistics may be inflated due to the use of simulation research paradigms in almost all of the examined studies.

PSYCHOLOGICAL INJURY & LAW (2022)

Article Psychology, Clinical

Assessing Negative Response Bias Using Self-Report Measures: New Articles, New Issues

Luciano Giromini et al.

Summary: In psychological injury and forensic evaluations, Symptom Validity Tests (SVTs) and Performance Validity Tests (PVTs) are commonly used to assess Negative Response Bias (NRB). However, there are few validated self-report SVTs available, and most research focuses on combining independent PVTs. This Special Issue aims to provide detailed information about the validity, strengths, weaknesses, and applicability of selected NRB measures, filling the gaps in the literature.

PSYCHOLOGICAL INJURY & LAW (2022)

Article Law

Self-report Measures for Symptom Validity Assessment in Whiplash-associated Disorders

David Pina et al.

Summary: This study aims to evaluate the capacity of several psychometric self-report instruments in discriminating patients with WAD and participants with malingering instructions. The results show that BPI, NDI, and SF-36 can effectively discriminate between different groups, while BAI, BDI, and BIPQ have a lower discriminatory capacity. This has important implications for the assessment and diagnosis of WAD.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY APPLIED TO LEGAL CONTEXT (2022)

Article Psychology, Clinical

Neurocognitive Profiles Associated With Limited English Proficiency in Cognitively Intact Adults

Maame A. Brantuo et al.

Summary: The objective of this study was to examine the neurocognitive profiles associated with limited English proficiency (LEP). A brief neuropsychological battery was administered to 80 university students, and it was found that individuals with LEP performed more poorly on high verbal mediation (HVM) measures compared to native speakers of English (NSEs), while performing equivalent to NSEs on low verbal mediation (LVM) measures. However, these tests may systematically underestimate cognitive ability in the LEP population.

ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY (2022)

Article Criminology & Penology

Detecting Coached Feigning of Schizophrenia with the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29) and Its Memory Module (IOP-M): A Simulation Study on a French Community Sample

Ingrid Banovic et al.

Summary: This study examined the validity and robustness of the IOP-29 and IOP-M in detecting coached feigning of schizophrenia through a simulation design. Results from a French sample of 115 volunteers supported the effectiveness of both IOP instruments, although the findings may not generalize to females as all participants were male.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORENSIC MENTAL HEALTH (2022)

Article Clinical Neurology

Towards an embedded symptom validity indicator for the rivermead postconcussion symptom questionnaire

Kristy Windle et al.

Summary: This simulation study developed an embedded symptom validity indicator for use with the Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ). The modified RPQ could eventually aid the screening of over-reporting of Post Concussion Symptoms (PCS).

APPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY-ADULT (2021)

Article Psychology, Clinical

Introducing a forced choice recognition trial to the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised

Christopher A. Abeare et al.

Summary: Recognition memory based EVIs effectively discriminated credible and non-credible response sets, FCR trial made unique contributions to performance validity assessment, and RD score <= 8 showed a good combination of sensitivity and specificity.

CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST (2021)

Article Psychology, Clinical

American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) 2021 consensus statement on validity assessment: Update of the 2009 AACN consensus conference statement on neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering

Jerry J. Sweet et al.

Summary: The consensus statement focuses on providing updated guidance on validity assessment, including redefining key terminology, affirming prior points, and introducing new points. The results show consensus among experts on validity assessment, covering definitions, assessment methods, research design, and more.

CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST (2021)

Article Psychology, Clinical

Performance Validity and Symptom Validity Tests: Are They Measuring Different Constructs?

Anna S. Ord et al.

Summary: The study evaluated the relationships among performance validity, symptom validity, symptom self-report, and objective cognitive testing in combat veterans. Results showed that performance and symptom validity tests measure distinct but related constructs, with the relationship between symptom validity and symptom report being strongest. SVTs are also differentially related to cognitive performance and symptom report based on the utilized cutoff score.

NEUROPSYCHOLOGY (2021)

Article Psychology, Clinical

Using the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29) with the Inventory of Problems Memory (IOP-M) in Malingering-Related Assessments: a Study with a Slovenian Sample of Experimental Feigners

Maja Masa Somen et al.

Summary: The study translated and tested the effectiveness of the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29) and its memory module (IOP-M) in Slovene language through a simulation study. Results showed that both tools effectively differentiated simulators from honest test-takers, and combining their results significantly improved classification accuracy.

PSYCHOLOGICAL INJURY & LAW (2021)

Article Psychology, Clinical

Comparability and Validity of the Online and In-Person Administrations of the Inventory of Problems-29

Luciano Giromini et al.

Summary: This study investigated the equivalence of scores from different administration formats of the IOP-29 and found that the effectiveness of the test is preserved when alternating between face-to-face and online/remote formats.

PSYCHOLOGICAL INJURY & LAW (2021)

Article Psychology, Clinical

Introducing Alternative Validity Cutoffs to Improve the Detection of Non-credible Symptom Report on the BRIEF

Kaitlyn Abeare et al.

Summary: This study investigates the potential of extreme scores on the BRIEF-A-SR as validity indicators, finding better classification accuracy in student sample. Combining individual cutoffs into a multivariate model can improve specificity and stabilize sensitivity in the clinical sample.

PSYCHOLOGICAL INJURY & LAW (2021)

Article Psychology, Clinical

Discriminating Feigned from Credible PTSD Symptoms: a Validation of a Brazilian Version of the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29)

Lucas de Francisco Carvalho et al.

Summary: The IOP-29 is a newly introduced symptom validity test with favorable classification accuracy and incremental validity when used in combination with other tests. Cross-validation in a Brazilian context showed good specificity and effectiveness in identifying feigned PTSD, with the new memory module showing potential incremental utility.

PSYCHOLOGICAL INJURY & LAW (2021)

Article Criminology & Penology

An Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29) study investigating feigned schizophrenia and random responding in a British community sample

Christina L. Winters et al.

Summary: While malingering research is still scarce in the United Kingdom compared to other Western countries, the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29) has shown excellent validity in detecting feigned schizophrenia, with a newly introduced scale aimed at detecting random responding demonstrating very promising results.

PSYCHIATRY PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW (2021)

Article Psychology, Biological

Distinguishing TBI Malingering and Fatigue Using Event-Related Potentials

Lindsey K. Robinson et al.

JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY (2020)

Article Psychology, Clinical

SVT Meets PVT: Development and Initial Validation of the Inventory of Problems - Memory (IOP-M)

Luciano Giromini et al.

PSYCHOLOGICAL INJURY & LAW (2020)

Article Psychology, Clinical

Types of Malingering in PTSD: Evidence from a Psychological Injury Paradigm

Katherine A. Fox et al.

PSYCHOLOGICAL INJURY & LAW (2020)

Article Psychology, Clinical

A multi-study examination of performance validity in undergraduate research participants

Scott Roye et al.

CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST (2019)

Review Clinical Neurology

Malingering and factitious disorder

Christopher Bass et al.

PRACTICAL NEUROLOGY (2019)

Article Psychiatry

The Detection of Malingering: A New Tool to Identify Made-Up Depression

Merylin Monaro et al.

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY (2018)

Article Psychology, Clinical

A Clinical Comparison, Simulation Study Testing the Validity of SIMS and IOP-29 with an Italian Sample

Luciano Giromini et al.

PSYCHOLOGICAL INJURY & LAW (2018)

Article Psychology, Clinical

I Just Want My Research Credit: Frequency of Suboptimal Effort in a Non-Clinical Healthy Undergraduate Sample

Jonathan DeRight et al.

CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST (2015)

Review Psychology, Clinical

Malingering in Forensic Disability-Related Assessments: Prevalence 15±15 %

Gerald Young

PSYCHOLOGICAL INJURY & LAW (2015)

Article Psychology, Clinical

Effort in College Undergraduates Is Sufficient on the Word Memory Test

Octavio A. Santos et al.

ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY (2014)

Article Psychology, Clinical

CE PTSD and Cognitive Functioning: Importance of Including Performance Validity Testing

Nick M. Wisdom et al.

CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST (2014)

Article Psychology, Clinical

Estimated Costs of Malingered Disability

Michael Chafetz et al.

ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY (2013)

Article Law

Malingering in the correctional system: Does incentive affect prevalence?

Barbara E. McDermott et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND PSYCHIATRY (2013)

Review Clinical Neurology

Effort, exaggeration and malingering after concussion

Jonathan M. Silver

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY (2012)

Article Clinical Neurology

Performance Validity and Symptom Validity in Neuropsychological Assessment

Glenn J. Larrabee

JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY (2012)

Article Psychology, Clinical

The Vulnerability to Coaching across Measures of Effort

Adrianne M. Brennan et al.

CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST (2009)

Article Psychology, Clinical

Fatigue following traumatic brain injury: Frequency, characteristics, and associated factors

MC Ouellet et al.

REHABILITATION PSYCHOLOGY (2006)

Article Psychology, Clinical

Detecting symptom- and test-coached simulators with the Test of Memory Malingering

MR Powell et al.

ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY (2004)

Article Psychology, Clinical

An MMPI-2 scale to detect malingered depression (Md scale)

JS Steffan et al.

ASSESSMENT (2003)

Article Psychology, Clinical

Base rates of malingering and symptom exaggeration

W Mittenberg et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY (2002)

Article Psychiatry

Health and disability costs of depressive illness in a major US corporation

BG Druss et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY (2000)

Article Psychology, Clinical

Can the MMPI-2 validity scales detect depression feigned by experts?

RM Bagby et al.

ASSESSMENT (2000)