4.5 Article

Quantum Integral Inequalities in the Setting of Majorization Theory and Applications

Journal

SYMMETRY-BASEL
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/sym14091925

Keywords

convex; quantum; Jensen-Mercer; differentiable; majorization

Funding

  1. King Saud University [RSP-2021/158]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper studies the theory and applications of convex mappings, and presents new Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities through the derivation and proof of several theorems and inequalities. The applications to special means further demonstrate the importance of the research.
In recent years, the theory of convex mappings has gained much more attention due to its massive utility in different fields of mathematics. It has been characterized by different approaches. In 1929, G. H. Hardy, J. E. Littlewood, and G. Polya established another characterization of convex mappings involving an ordering relationship defined over PO known as majorization theory. Using this theory many inequalities have been obtained in the literature. In this paper, we study Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities using the Jensen-Mercer inequality in the frame of q-calculus and majorized l-tuples. Firstly we derive q-Hermite-Hadamard-Jensen-Mercer (H.H.J.M) type inequalities with the help of Mercer's inequality and its weighted form. To obtain some new generalized (H.H.J.M)-type inequalities, we prove a generalized quantum identity for q-differentiable mappings. Next, we obtain some estimation-type results; for this purpose, we consider q-identity, fundamental inequalities and the convexity property of mappings. Later on, We offer some applications to special means that demonstrate the importance of our main results. With the help of numerical examples, we also check the validity of our main outcomes. Along with this, we present some graphical analyses of our main results so that readers may easily grasp the results of this paper.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available