4.6 Article

Evaluating the Sustainable Development of the Semiconductor Industry Using BWM and Fuzzy TOPSIS

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 14, Issue 17, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su141710693

Keywords

BWM; fuzzy TOPSIS; aspiration level; SDGs

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes a model that helps the semiconductor industry achieve sustainable development through a systematic analysis. By using the Best Worst Method to determine the weights of evaluation criteria and optimizing the fuzzy TOPSIS technique, the study identifies green resource integration and pollution-discharge treatment as the most important criteria for industry's sustainable development.
In recent years, the advancement of electronic technology has been driving a boom in the semiconductor industry worldwide. When implementing business activities, those involved strive to pursue the balanced development of the economy, society, environment, and ecology. Our proposed model provides a systematic analysis process to help conduct a comprehensive evaluation and determine priorities in the semiconductor industry's pursuit of sustainable development. In the proposed model, we determine the weights of evaluation criteria using the Best Worst Method, which overcomes the shortcomings of AHP. Meanwhile, we incorporate the concept of the aspiration level to optimize the fuzzy TOPSIS technique. The results reveal that the two most important criteria are green resource integration and pollution-discharge treatment for sustainable development in the semiconductor industry. In the traditional TOPSIS method, pollution-discharge treatment is considered the expected value, leading the decision-maker to believe that no improvement is required for pollution-discharge treatment. The model proposed in this study can overcome the abovementioned shortcoming and offer more reliable managerial implications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available