4.6 Article

Embodied Carbon Emissions in Export of Yangtze River Delta: Calculation and Decomposition of Driving Factors

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 14, Issue 19, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su141912415

Keywords

export; embodied carbon emissions; input-output analysis; LMDI method

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Yangtze River Delta is a crucial region for China's emission reduction and green transformation exports, accounting for over 1/3 of the country's total export. This study adopts input-output analysis and the LMDI method to quantitatively analyze carbon emissions and driving factors by region. The findings suggest that the government should set carbon emission standards, introduce incentive mechanisms, and optimize the export structure to achieve carbon neutrality goals. Additionally, accelerating technological innovation and promoting the adoption of new energy sources are crucial for a low-carbon, clean, and sustainable green development path.
The total export of the Yangtze River Delta exceeds 1/3 of China. This region is the backbone of China's emission reduction and green transformation exports. This paper adopts input-output analysis to calculate direct carbon emission coefficients and embodied carbon in exports. Using the LMDI method, the total embodied carbon emissions and driving factors are quantitatively analyzed by region in terms of scale effect, structural effect and technology effect. Based on the results of the study, the government should actively promote the achievement of carbon neutrality goals by setting carbon emission standards or introducing regulatory policies and incentive mechanisms. Meanwhile, the export structure needs to be continuously optimized. It is necessary to accelerate technological innovation while actively promoting and encouraging the adoption of new energy sources in order to take a low-carbon, clean and sustainable green development path.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available