Journal
SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 14, Issue 17, Pages -Publisher
MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su141711029
Keywords
tanker water; water markets; informal water vendors; sustainable access to water
Funding
- US National Science Foundation [ICER/EAR-1829999]
- Belmont Forum
- German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [033WU002]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This article systematically summarizes existing empirical knowledge on tanker water markets (TWM) and examines the evidence supporting the normative claims about the impacts of TWM on sustainability goals. The available evidence suggests that TWM provide high service levels and fill gaps in urban water systems, but their high prices make them unaffordable for all. Additionally, the allocation outcomes of TWM do not align with existing notions of equitable access. However, there is little convincing evidence that TWM necessarily lead to unsustainable water use.
Tanker water markets (TWM) supply water services in many urban areas, including those unconnected to public infrastructures. Notwithstanding, they have been associated with outcomes in conflict with sustainability goals of water policy, e.g., through inequitable and unaffordable supply or by contributing to groundwater overexploitation. So far, the literature dedicated to TWM has primarily conducted case studies embedded in diverse local contexts, which impedes the comparison and transfer of insights. In this article, we systematically summarize existing empirical knowledge on TWM and assess to what extent normative claims about the impacts of TWM on sustainability goals are supported by evidence. We use the concept of sustainable access, which combines notions of what constitutes access to water and what characterizes sustainable supply of services. The available evidence suggests that TWM have two key functions in urban water systems: (1) They provide services at otherwise unavailable levels, particularly with respect to the temporal availability and spatial accessibility of the service, and (2) they extend access to areas without or with low-quality network supply, typically low-income communities on the fringe of cities. From the perspective of sustainable access, we find that TWM can provide high service levels and thus fill a specific gap in the landscape of urban water services. Due to comparatively high prices, however, it is unlikely that these services are affordable for all. The combination of heterogeneous access to cheaper (subsidized) piped water and marginal pricing in TWM results in allocation outcomes that are not coherent with existing notions of equitable access to water. However, there is little convincing evidence that TWM necessarily result in unsustainable water use. The literature indicates that urban water governance in the studied areas is frequently characterized by a lack of effective institutions, which impedes the regulation or formalization of TWM.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available