4.6 Article

Seismic Fragility Analysis of Aqueduct Structural Systems Based on G-PCM Method

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 14, Issue 20, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su142013161

Keywords

aqueduct; seismic fragility; structural system; G-PCM method; component; IDA method

Funding

  1. Key Scientific Research Projects of Colleges and Universities in Henan Province [22A560003]
  2. Henan Provincial Science and Technology Research Project [212102310935]
  3. North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power Master's Innovation Ability Improvement Project [YK-2021-52]
  4. Kashi District Science and Technology Planning Project [KS2022101]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51408223]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study applied the G-PCM method to analyze the seismic fragility of an aqueduct system, revealing that the bearings of the aqueduct are more susceptible to damage, the system as a whole has a higher failure probability than individual components, and the fragility curves obtained using the G-PCM method are more accurate.
In order to accurately predict the seismic fragility of an aqueduct system, the General Product of Conditional Marginal (G-PCM) method was applied to the seismic fragility analysis of the aqueduct structural system, consisting of interrelated components such as the aqueduct body, pier, and support. First, a finite element dynamic analysis model of a three-span aqueduct with an equidistant simply-supported beam was established, based on the OpenSees platform. The uncertainties of structure, ground motion, and structural capacity were considered, and then the incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) method was used to calculate the seismic fragility of the three individual components, such as the aqueduct pier, the plate rubber bearing at the cap beam, and the PTFE sliding plate bearing at the aqueduct platform. Subsequently, seismic fragility curves of the aqueduct system were established using the G-PCM method and were compared with the traditional second-order bound method. The results showed that the two bearings of the aqueduct are more likely to be damaged than the pier; the failure probability of the aqueduct system is higher than that of any single component; and the seismic fragility curves of the aqueduct system acquired via the G-PCM method were all within the range of the failure probability obtained by the second-order bound method and had a better accuracy, which is suitable for the seismic fragility analysis of multi-failure mode aqueduct systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available